<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/serendipity/templates/default/atom.css" type="text/css" ?>

<feed 
   xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
    <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/feeds/atom.xml" rel="self" title="Proving the Obviously Untrue" type="application/atom+xml" />
    <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/"                        rel="alternate"    title="Proving the Obviously Untrue" type="text/html" />
    <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=2.0"     rel="alternate"    title="Proving the Obviously Untrue" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title type="html">Proving the Obviously Untrue</title>
    <subtitle type="html">Maths, Software, Hardware, Martial Arts and more</subtitle>
    
    <id>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/</id>
    <updated>2009-01-06T11:13:43Z</updated>
    <generator uri="http://www.s9y.org/" version="1.3.1-1">Serendipity 1.3.1-1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

    <entry>
        <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/72-Crashing-Cars,-an-answer.html" rel="alternate" title="Crashing Cars, an answer?" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2009-01-06T11:13:43Z</published>
        <updated>2009-01-06T11:13:43Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=72</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=72</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/72-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Crashing Cars, an answer?</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Every year I attempt to visit my old PhD supervisor Brian McMaster (old in the sense that my PhD is now a thing of the past, I am making no reference to the man in question!) at Christmas time to have a quick natter and exchange gifts. I was squeezed for time this year since I also had to hire a gown from Queen's to attend an event for the University of Ulster (long and boring story - getting an <a href="http://news.ulster.ac.uk/releases/2008/4193.html">award</a> for our work on <a href="http://foss.ulster.ac.uk/projects/opus">OPUS</a>). Anyway, just before I left, I asked him about my previous <a href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/68-Crashing-Cars.html">Crashing Cars</a> problem. He wasn't by any means the first PhD I'd asked about this, and I'd even asked a few physicists. I was hoping of course, that he would immediately say I was being stupid and had missed something obvious, but he found the problem as bothersome as I did.<br /><br />

I continued to mull it over a bit, and even found the problem had some more unsettling properties to do with the masses of the car, but didn't make any progress unraveling the mystery. Well, a few days later Brian CC'd me on an email to someone with whom he had clearly been discussing the problem with a possible solution. Having read it a good few times and thought it over it makes sense to me and it doesn't come as a surprise that Brian was the one who cracked the central nub of the problem. I'm a lot more cheerful about it now, but it goes to show that dark nasties can lurk in surprisingly simple problems.

<blockquote>
I was brooding some more about the frames of reference thing and maybe beginning to see where the paradox lies. Thing is [perhaps] that the observer in the car is non-accelerated only up to the moment of impact: we can't use him to assess KE after that moment with the same cavalier abandon that prevailed beforehand. [Especially since he'll have a headache.] Thus it is not legitimate to say: "from car 1's POV, KE before = 2mv2, KE after = 0 + 0, therefore KE dissipated into crunch = 2mv2". Which would be very troubling since it would appear to let us distinguish between states of rest/uniform motion by Physics. <br /><br />


What we can say instead is that from the point of view of a non-accelerated observer *travelling initially with car 1*, the KE before = 2mv2 and the KE after = 1/2 2m (-v)2 = mv2 so the KE going into the impact process = 2mv2 - mv2 = mv2. Which agrees with the observer on the roadside! So maybe the old geezer with the mop of white hair and the century's most iconic formula was right after all. I'm sufficiently encouraged to copy this email to my tormentor in Jordanstown and see if it allays his apprehensions. Hi Colin!
</blockquote> 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/71-Debians-navel-gazing.html" rel="alternate" title="Debian's navel gazing" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-12-19T13:05:25Z</published>
        <updated>2008-12-19T13:05:25Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=71</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=71</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/11-Free-Software" label="Free Software" term="Free Software" />
    
        <id>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/71-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Debian's navel gazing</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <a href="http://www.debian.org">Debian</a> is my favourite distribution of GNU/Linux. It's a well respected and well known brand, although I was almost stunned while on business in London last Friday to meet someone who knew about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suse">Suse</a>, and <a href="http://www.redhat.com">Red Hat</a> but wasn't even aware of the existence of Debian. I like Debian's astonishing infrastructure, and its community led approach. It has been on the verge of releasing its next stable version, Lenny, for some time.  I've been waiting for that freeze to end to have my debian packages of <a href="http://foss.ulster.ac.uk/projects/opus/">OPUS</a> uploaded, since there is currently no real rush and I wanted to do more "upstream" work on them. At that point I wanted to start the long path to DD status (via maintainer).<br /><br />

<a href="http://www.earth.li/~noodles/blog/">Noodles</a>, who is a DD, has recently commented on his frustration that Debian <a href="http://www.earth.li/~noodles/blog/2008/12/debian-king-of-procrastination.html">procrastinates</a> at the end of every release cycle. This seems to be true, and internecine war always seems to erupt over issues that should have been solved long before (or alternatively after) the release. I'm also sympathetic to his suggestion that Debian's voting procedures could be <a href="http://www.earth.li/~noodles/blog/2008/12/we-need-a-stfu-option.html">improved</a>.<br /><br />

Reading through <a href="http://planet.debian.net/">Planet Debian</a> today, I am more depressed than ever. Debian's secretary has resigned over voting issues and the vitriol unleashed by them. I'm not making any comment on that. There is already a constitutional pathway for an interim secretary, but now, the project can begin to rip new wounds in itself over the resignation, rumours of expulsion procedures and what to do next. What to do next is damn important, but so is the release.<br /><br />

I was in Plymouth in September with Lenny installer beta 2 CDs with Lenny images that wouldn't even install on the new hardware in a problem <a href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/40-Marvell-Technology-88SE6121-SATA-II-Controller.html">frustrating similar to one I found months before</a> (<a href="http://www.ubuntu.org">Ubuntu</a>, derived from Debian, embarrassingly did so without problems). I dare say that issue has been fixed (I can no longer test it), but it's a horrible reminder of how a prolonged freeze can lead to an OS that can be born obsolete in the sense that it can't install on newer hardware. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/70-Jeff-Buckleys-Hallelujah.html" rel="alternate" title="Jeff Buckley's Hallelujah" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-12-19T10:27:36Z</published>
        <updated>2008-12-19T10:27:36Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=70</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=70</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/70-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Jeff Buckley's Hallelujah</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Ok. I dislike the X-Factor. I think Ben Elton's book <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/search?ie=UTF8&keywords=chart+throb&tag=mycroft16-21&index=blended&linkCode=ur2&camp=1634&creative=6738">Chart Throb</a> pretty much says it all.<br /><br />

I managed to watch very little of it this year (harder than it sounds given the exposure you get from other people) but <strong>did</strong> manage to be totally oblivious to the outcome. I remain so, with pride. However, I did hear that the song they are torturing this year to get the Christmas Number 1 is another cover of Leonard Cohen's Hallelujah.<br /><br />

Well, I suspected that the <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=66500765224">facebook group</a> was right on the matter, that it would be a soulless piece of merchandising, I just heard it, it is. Standard over produced tosh.<br /><br />

Well, I whole heartedly agree, Jeff Buckley's version is not only better, it is one of the most beautiful performances of any song I have ever heard and has long been a favourite of mine. I already own two copies of it on genuine real physical media, but I'll be downloading too. Probably futile, but I'll feel better for having tried. If you want to join the rebellion the link above has the details.<br /><br />

Oh, and you kids, get off my lawn! 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/68-Crashing-Cars.html" rel="alternate" title="Crashing Cars" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-12-11T10:27:44Z</published>
        <updated>2008-12-14T22:15:39Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=68</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=68</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/12-STEM" label="STEM" term="STEM" />
    
        <id>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/68-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Crashing Cars</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Consider two identical cars, each travelling at a constant velocity v towards each other. Suppose that they crash, and to simplify things, let's not consider any rebound. Then the energy of each is kinetic in nature and so the energy of the crash is given by<br /><br />

<img src="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/plugin/mimetex.php?q=%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7Dmv%5E2%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7Dmv%5E2%20%3D%20mv%5E2" title="\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}mv^2 = mv^2" alt="\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}mv^2 = mv^2" \/><br /><br />

Ok. That's a nice way to show the energy of the collision goes up with the square of velocity.

Now, according to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_relativity">principle of relativity</a> this should be an identical situation if you consider it from the reference frame of one of the cars. In that case, the car you are looking at has a velocity of 0, while the other car has a velocity of 2v. Now the total energy of the crash looks like<br /><br />

<img src="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/plugin/mimetex.php?q=%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20m%20%282v%29%5E2%20%2B%200%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20m%20%5Ctimes%204v%5E2%20%3D%202mv%5E2" title="\frac{1}{2} m (2v)^2 + 0 = \frac{1}{2} m \times 4v^2 = 2mv^2" alt="\frac{1}{2} m (2v)^2 + 0 = \frac{1}{2} m \times 4v^2 = 2mv^2" \/><br /><br />

So. Why the discrepancy? 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/67-Dear-LazyWeb,-IcedoveThunderbird-is-annoying-because....html" rel="alternate" title="Dear LazyWeb, Icedove/Thunderbird is annoying because..." />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-11-25T22:55:00Z</published>
        <updated>2008-11-25T23:05:28Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=67</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=67</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/11-Free-Software" label="Free Software" term="Free Software" />
    
        <id>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/67-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Dear LazyWeb, Icedove/Thunderbird is annoying because...</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I use Icedove for mail mainly (the Debian variant of Thunderbird - a long and not very interesting story). I generally like it. I've used pine and mutt, but generally get too much stuff to view to make a text mode editor much fun. I've used evolution, but it was for a long time very slow, so now I tend to use Icedove. It locks up rather frequently on imladris (my main machine) running Debian unstable, and while I've now downloaded some debugging symbols I haven't devoted the time to finding out why yet.<br /><br />

Anyway, there are three things about it that really, really peeve me:

<ul>
  <li>Why don't the damn tags in version 2+ actually stick (in my imap folders, in dovecot) so that I <strong>reliably</strong> see them using the same flaming program in work?</li>
  <li>The feature to show a newly received mail is great, but it would be one thousand times more useful if I could tell the program to only feature mail in certain folders and/or not others. I don't really need to be told about how many thousands of new messages I have in my spam filtering folders all the time.</li>
  <li>Why does the exact same program view emails on my laptop in such a way that I frequently see all the "Your editor does not support graphical content" stuff on such emails?</li>
</ul>

Yes, I've tried google, yes, I've tried FAQs. Can't find the answers. I'm sure I've looked right past them. Anybody?<br /><br />

BTW... Two posts in one day? Not an excess of free time, trying desperately to take my mind of one of my cats who is very ill atm. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/66-Einstein-and-Eddington.html" rel="alternate" title="Einstein and Eddington" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-11-25T19:31:35Z</published>
        <updated>2008-11-25T19:31:35Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=66</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=66</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/12-STEM" label="STEM" term="STEM" />
    
        <id>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/66-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Einstein and Eddington</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                On Saturday night, quite by accident, I sat down to watch "Einstein and Eddington" on the BBC. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein">Einstein</a> has been an inspiration to me from an early age, and I'd known a lot about his life and work, and for many years a picture of him has adorned my room or office, though not at the moment as it happens. I suppose in compensation einstein is the hostname of my work computer at the moment.<br /><br />

Anyway I was also for this reason aware of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Stanley_Eddington">Arthur Eddington</a>, and his famous experiment to verify that gravity bent starlight. I was also aware of his famous quote regarding being one of three men who understood <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity">General Relativity</a>. Nevertheless, it was fascinating to see the historical context of the interaction between these men, and a bit more of Eddington's life. I would recommend the programme highly, so if you're in the UK you have a few more days to catch it on <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00ft62c/Einstein_and_Eddington/">iPlayer</a>.<br /><br />

Great performances from Tennant and Serkis. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/65-BBC-Logical-Paradox.html" rel="alternate" title="BBC Logical Paradox" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-11-19T11:43:47Z</published>
        <updated>2008-11-22T10:09:58Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=65</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=65</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/65-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">BBC Logical Paradox</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I was just reading the BBC's article about the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7736794.stm">leaked details of BNP members.</a>. It's an interesting story, although of course here in Northern Ireland we have our own unique brand of prejudiced politics. (This reminds me of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankie_boyle">Frankie Boyle</a> joking about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda">Al Qaeda</a> trying to bring religious intolerance to Scotland, that they were centuries behind the competition and didn't even have their own football team. That and they were dealing with the kinds of people <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaselector/check/player/nol/newsid_6250000/newsid_6257300?redirect=6257318.stm&news=1&bbram=1&nbwm=1&nbram=1&bbwm=1">who punch burning men in the face</a>.)<br /><br />

Anyway, I'm digressing. At the bottom of the page there was the usual comment form, but I think the disclaimers above and below the form bear some reading. Is this a trap for particularly mentally slow BNP members (yes, I know you're all making your own punch line now).
<div class="serendipity_imageComment_center" style="width: 597px"><div class="serendipity_imageComment_img"><!-- s9ymdb:21 --><img class="serendipity_image_center" width="597" height="539"  src="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/uploads/BBC-BNP.png" alt="" /></div><div class="serendipity_imageComment_txt">Just what do the BBC plan to do with this?</div></div><br /><br />

<strong>Update</strong>

I did of course contact the BBC about this rather than just laugh about it here, and as is often the case, they fixed the problem with the usual efficiency. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/64-Windows-anti-virus.html" rel="alternate" title="Windows &quot;anti-virus&quot;" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-11-09T17:58:02Z</published>
        <updated>2008-11-10T07:19:39Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=64</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=64</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/64-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Windows &quot;anti-virus&quot;</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Today I was asked to look at a computer that was claiming to be infested by viruses following clicking on a link from <a href="http://www.facebook.com">facebook</a>. This was of course a Windows situation, so I was unsure how much help I could be given how long it's been since I had to use Windows.<br /><br />

Anyway, I booted up the computer which swapped incessantly due to the low memory it had, but also due to whatever malware was at play. So eventually windows booted up, launched Internet Explorer which was already suspicious, and the systray showed a flashing shield. It didn't take me too long to work out that the window full of virus reports was bogus. Eventually I killed all the running crap in the task manager (ctrl-alt-del) then loading the task manager to start closing various applications. I also closed the "WAV" and suspicious "cmd" processes that were taking much of the CPU and had no good reason to be running.<br /><br />

After that, I nuked the contents of "C:\Program Files\WAV" suspecting that to be the problem, and for good measure ran the registry editor (Start, Run, type regedit and hit enter) and searched for occurrences of WAV that pertained to this stuff and nuked them. That is, of course, not for the unwary. When I restarted all was well and the problem was gone. Well, I removed the shortcut on the desktop for the now non-existant WAV. I'm putting this here so it can be forwarded to a few other victims.<br /><br />

Friends shouldn't let friends run Windows. I know... 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/63-More-on-Debian-on-the-Toshiba-R500.html" rel="alternate" title="More on Debian on the Toshiba R500" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-10-07T21:16:33Z</published>
        <updated>2008-10-07T21:16:33Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=63</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=63</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/6-hardware" label="hardware" term="hardware" />
    
        <id>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/63-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">More on Debian on the Toshiba R500</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Previously, I <a href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/55-Debian-GNULinux-on-Toshiba-Portege-R500.html">wrote</a> about installing Debian GNU/Linux on the Toshiba Portege R500. Most of the information is still current, but I'm writing a follow up to address other things I got working and questions people have posed me.<br /><br />

<strong>Bluetooth Support</strong><br /><br />

I still need to patch the kernel to get bluetooth support working. At the moment I am patching toshiba_acpi which then allows the various commands (see the previous article) such as the one for enabling bluetooth. Glibly talking about patching the kernel is of very little help for those that don't know how, so for Pere who requested that, here's a set of commands, executed as root which should make that simpler. Note, you might want to edit the file mentioned below for SD support too if you need it before doing this.<br /><br />

<div class="bb-code-title">CODE:</div><div class="bb-code">#
#&#160;Install&#160;the&#160;source&#160;for&#160;the&#160;kernel,&#160;and&#160;the&#160;debian&#160;package&#160;that&#160;makes
#&#160;compiling&#160;it&#160;easier
#
aptitude&#160;install&#160;linux-source-2.6.26&#160;kernel-package
#
#&#160;Go&#160;get&#160;it&#160;and&#160;open&#160;it&#160;all&#160;up,&#160;you&#160;might&#160;need&#160;to&#160;change&#160;paths&#160;based&#160;on
#&#160;exactly&#160;what&#160;kernel&#160;is&#160;fetched
#
cd&#160;/usr/src/
bunzip2&#160;linux-source-2.6.26.tar.bz2
tar&#160;xvf&#160;linux-source-2.6.26.tar
#
#&#160;Go&#160;to&#160;where&#160;the&#160;patch&#160;will&#160;be&#160;applied
#
cd&#160;linux_source-2.6.26/drivers/acpi/
#
#&#160;Changes&#160;paths&#160;as&#160;required&#160;obviously!&#160;Note&#160;there&#160;is&#160;a&#160;new&#160;patch&#160;for
#&#160;2.6.26
#
patch&#160;-p0&#160;&#60;&#160;~colin/Install/toshiba_acpi-dev_toshiba_test5-linux_2.6.26.patch
cd&#160;../../
#&#160;Copy&#160;the&#160;current&#160;kernel&#160;config,&#160;it's&#160;a&#160;good&#160;guess&#160;and&#160;suitable&#160;for&#160;Debian&#160;stock&#160;kernels
cp&#160;/boot/config-2.6.26-1-amd64&#160;.config
#&#160;Actually&#160;compile&#160;the&#160;kernel,&#160;could&#160;take&#160;a&#160;while!
make-kpkg&#160;--initrd&#160;kernel_image
#&#160;Install&#160;the&#160;.deb&#160;created&#160;in&#160;the&#160;directory&#160;above
dpkg&#160;-i&#160;../linux-image-2.6.26_2.6.26-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb
#&#160;That&#160;should&#160;be&#160;it</div>
<br />


<strong>Headphones</strong><br /><br />

Headphones can work with the main sound muted. If you double click on the mixer icon in Gnome, and go to <em>edit -> preferences</em> you will see a number of controls that can be turned on. You will see a switch for "Headphones". Enable that. This switch now appears in a tab, and you can select it. When you mute the "Front" you should still get sound in the headphones, and indeed, the rotary control on the side still works. If you're a command line kind of person, <em>alsamixer</em> will be your friend.<br /><br />

<strong>SD Card Support</strong><br /><br />

SD card support didn't work out of the box for me. I had to patch yet another file. I say patch, but I just directly edited a file as per <a href="http://www.linlap.com/wiki/Toshiba+Portege+R500">instructions</a> I found elsewhere. Essentially I just edited <em>drivers/mmc/core/core.c</em><br /><br />

<div class="bb-code-title">CODE:</div><div class="bb-code">	/&#42;
	&#160;&#42;&#160;This&#160;delay&#160;must&#160;be&#160;at&#160;least&#160;74&#160;clock&#160;sizes,&#160;or&#160;1&#160;ms,&#160;or&#160;the
	&#160;&#42;&#160;time&#160;required&#160;to&#160;reach&#160;a&#160;stable&#160;voltage.
	&#160;&#42;/
&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;/&#42;&#160;mmc_delay&#40;2&#41;;&#160;--&#160;too&#160;small&#160;on&#160;R500&#160;&#42;/
	mmc_delay&#40;10&#41;;</div>

<br /><br />

<strong>Suspend to RAM</strong><br /><br />

Pere, who comments on the previous article, wrote that changing the contents (in my case creating) <em>/etc/pm/config.d/config</em> and entering<br />
<code>SUSPEND_MODULES="ehci_hcd"</code><br /> makes it all work. I agree! Thanks Pere.<br /><br />

<strong>Fingerprint Reader</strong><br /><br />

These packages are still experimental, so if you don't know how to install them, well you probably shouldn't. I have installed them, but found their enclosed <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496153">documentation to be inaccurate</a>. I have tried various ways to configure PAM to support it, but none of them work really as I want them to. I might play with this again sometime.<br /><br />

That's it. My initial good feelings have been more than confirmed. It's a great laptop, and great with Debian. I did have to poke with some BIOS settings with toshset to solve the problems of the grub screen not appearing and xrandr working with a second display. Unfortunately I can't remember what I changed. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/62-Guided-LVM-in-Debian.html" rel="alternate" title="Guided LVM in Debian" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-10-07T20:07:49Z</published>
        <updated>2008-10-07T20:07:49Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=62</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=62</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/11-Free-Software" label="Free Software" term="Free Software" />
    
        <id>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/62-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Guided LVM in Debian</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I recently reinstalled one of the boxes here, Lorien, from scratch. It was a brand new SATA disk and I used the Debian Lenny beta 2 installer. I'd never tried LVM before, I'd always used "normal" partitioning, but for some reason I figured I'd give this a shot. It all worked ok, but it left one problem. The amount of space Debian allocated to the root partition was pitifully small (less than 300 megabytes), and I hit a snag when a kernel upgrade came through, and wanted to install lots of stuff in that partition. So, first of all a warning, the guided partitioning is, and always has been in my opinion, not too optimal in the way it picks spaces for partitions. Secondly, here is how I fixed it, which is a slight pain since you can't have the root partition mounted.<br /><br />

Since I was going to have to resize my root partition, I used my Debian install CD again, but this time in <em>rescue</em> mode (just type rescue at the prompt).

Then you can get a terminal up. I had inadvertently mounted my root partition as /target, so I began by unmounting it.<br /><br />

<div class="bb-code-title">CODE:</div><div class="bb-code">umount&#160;/target</div>
<br />

Next we need to reduce a partition. I chose to resize my home partition, original 200G to 199G, since I reckoned an extra gigabyte would be more than enough on the root partition.<br /><br />

<div class="bb-code-title">CODE:</div><div class="bb-code">#&#160;Check&#160;the&#160;filesystem
e2fsck&#160;-f&#160;/dev/lorien/home
#&#160;Make&#160;it&#160;slightly&#160;smaller
resize2fs&#160;/dev/lorien/home&#160;199G
#&#160;We&#160;are&#160;about&#160;to&#160;play&#160;with&#160;LVM
lvchange&#160;-a&#160;n&#160;/dev/lorien/home
#&#160;Tell&#160;it&#160;to&#160;reduce&#160;the&#160;size&#160;by&#160;1&#160;Gigabyte
lcreduce&#160;-L-1g&#160;/dev/lorien/home
#&#160;Done&#160;with&#160;LVM
lvchange&#160;-a&#160;y&#160;/dev/lorien/home
#&#160;Check&#160;the&#160;filesystem&#160;again
e2fsck&#160;-f&#160;/dev/lorien/home</div>
<br />

Finally, increase the size of the root partition.<br /><br />

<div class="bb-code-title">CODE:</div><div class="bb-code">#&#160;Playing&#160;with&#160;LVM
lvchange&#160;-a&#160;n&#160;/dev/lorien/root
#&#160;Increase&#160;the&#160;LV&#160;by&#160;1&#160;G
lvextend&#160;-L+1g&#160;/dev/lorien/root
#&#160;Finished&#160;with&#160;LVM
lvchange&#160;-a&#160;y&#160;/dev/lorien/root
#&#160;Check&#160;the&#160;file&#160;system
e2fsck&#160;-f&#160;/dev/lorien/root
#&#160;resize&#160;it
resize2fs&#160;/dev/lorien/root
#&#160;Check&#160;one&#160;last&#160;time.
e2fsk&#160;-f&#160;/dev/lorien/root</div> 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/61-In-2008,-you-might-still-need-to-lie-about-your-OS.html" rel="alternate" title="In 2008, you might still need to lie about your OS" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-09-28T21:09:12Z</published>
        <updated>2008-09-29T11:46:54Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=61</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=61</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/12-STEM" label="STEM" term="STEM" />
    
        <id>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/61-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">In 2008, you might still need to lie about your OS</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Today my sister-in-law, Siobhan, asked me to help her debug her brand new Sky ADSL set-up. She told me her PC, with a wireless adapter, was connecting OK, but she couldn't get onto the internet at large. I was relieved I had decided to throw my laptop in my bag when I came down to visit as that would make the whole thing a lot easier. I went up to the house, opened my laptop and in a few seconds it was ready from hibernation (into Debian). Very quickly we identified the wireless network, put in the passphrase, and got connected straight away.<br /><br />

So the wireless was working OK as it appeared, and all attempts to surf elsewhere failed. I surfed to 192.168.0.1 and was rewarded by the router login screen, I recognised it as a Netgear device, but the usual netgear "admin" and "password" didn't cut it. Google, via my N95 supplied that "admin" and "sky" was the answer. Result, I was in and could see that there was an IP allocated to the router. I did some pings from my laptop, and found that the packet loss was almost, but not always, complete, and that sometimes DNS worked, sometimes it didn't. All my nice tools in Debian made the diagnosis easier. At this point I was assuming a line problem and that the speed would need to be restrained.<br /><br />

So, I hooked the laptop to the router directly with a cable, just to rule anything else out, and because I knew the tech people would fret about it needlessly, and I saw the router kept losing it's connection periodically - it would stay up for minutes, but nothing useful could be done with it then. So, it was time to ring the dreaded helpline. Siobhan had to go through the usual Q&A, including some quizzing about how her name was spelt, and then I was placed on the phone to speak to the tech-girl as it happened to be in this case. I tried, politely but fairly deperately to short-cut the endless questions by outlining what I had already discovered. She asked me if I was using Vista, I said "No, Linux", so she asked again if it was Vista or XP, and I said it was neither, it was Linux, but that the problem was between the router and their operation somewhere. So we got put on hold for about 5 minutes, and already I had the feeling of dread - I should have just lied. She came back on the phone and told me that her colleagues said Linux wasn't supported and I'd have to use another OS so she could talk me through settings.<br /><br />

With now rapidly mounting exasperation I explained I was already connected to the router, both on the network and with a browser, could clearly see the outbound connection going up and down like a yoyo, and that rebooting into another OS would make absolutely no difference to the problem, but of course, she was adamant, so with great irritation and reluctance I rebooted into Vista, waited for it to finally sort itself out, logged in and ... the phone line went dead.<br /><br />

So now, punching the floor with irritation, I ask Siobhan to phone back, get through the maze of keypresses and introductions and we get the second person. She wants to start at the beginning, but we try hard to get her to understand what we have already found. She at least seems to understand it's not an OS problem. She tells me to try another microfilter, I say fine, but I obviously can't do it just as we're on the phone, she says "That's correct, you would be disconnected". Well... yes, I got that. Anyway, we go through a few other gems and I anticipate her asking me to unscrew the BT master faceplate and plug things in there.<br /><br />

So we do that, with little hope, it doesn't work. I curse Vista as I try to navigate IE (I don't even dare use firefox in case they moan about that). Again, we call, the same procedure, the third person, who talks to Siobhan only, and is happy without further technobabble, to finally redirect us to the "Solution Centre" or some such. Siobhan begins to talk to operative number four, and passes me over.<br /><br />

Joy... She understands the problem is at their end, she limits the speed on the connection, just like that it all starts to work. I thank her profusely and say it's a pleasure to finally get to someone who doesn't ask me to check if I have an electricity supply. She comes from Northern Ireland too, we share a quick laugh about it all, she helpfully suggests that she'll leave the ticket open while we check over the weekend the new "fix" is stable. Yes, I know I can be a grumpy old [whatever] about it, and that the tech people often have to speak to people who don't have a clue what they are doing, but it is exasperating when they can't go a little beyond the script to realise you might actually know how to help them fix your problem.<br /><br />

Way back in the early days of ISPs in Northern Ireland I found some problem, carefully excluded local causes and called the ISP to report it to them. Foolishly I told them at the time I was using WAN and LAN at the same time (Netware), to which they promptly told me that was impossible and refused to discuss the problem further. I pointed out that not only was it possible, it was all working nicely in the morning. So I called back and just lied that time.<br /><br />

The moral of the story seems to be, when someone asks if you are running Vista, just say "yes". 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/60-Playstation-3-80Gb.html" rel="alternate" title="Playstation 3 80Gb" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-08-31T01:50:14Z</published>
        <updated>2008-08-31T17:09:44Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=60</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/6-hardware" label="hardware" term="hardware" />
            <category scheme="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/3-review" label="review" term="review" />
    
        <id>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/60-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Playstation 3 80Gb</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I had a PS1 and have a PS2. I've put off buying a PS3 for a while because they were so dear, the graphics seemed to be at the expense of game play, and because I missed the boat on backwards compatibility on the first model. Today I phoned a friend to ask about backwards compatibility and he told me it was all just software now. Ok, that's not going to get any better, so I finally went out and bought a PS3. The big display box features prominent billing for the new dual shock controllers. You won't notice, unless you turn the box round after you get handed one, that it says it no longer has <strong>any</strong> backwards compatibility with the PS2, <strong>not even software</strong> but rather absurdly, there <em>is</em> PS1 support. I think Sony have finally lost their minds, they seem to be on a campaign to progressively punish customers who weren't early adopters. Whatever saving they made for this compromise probably wasn't worth it, and if I'd read this before I purchased that might well have been the clinching point. Yes, I have a PS2, but I just took it out of place to make room for this beast. Now I need to find a home for both.<br /><br />

Next I began trying to set up a media server on my main Debian box, <em>imladris</em>. I first tried gmediaserver, but found that I could see all the files but the PS3 said "unsupported data" for all of them, then I tried mediatomb, and had the same problem, even after tweaking the config.xml file to add PS3 compatibility, and using the command line tool to import files. I finally found that by surfing to <strong>http://localhost:49152/</strong> and adding the directory from that interface that it worked. Phew. This was a big reason for buying the PS3.<br /><br />

So I sat down to play <em>Ratchett &amp; Clank</em> and was immediately told I hadn't enough disk space. Absurd. I have 60+ Gb free and need 419 Mb. I find there's a known bug that means I need to download a big file to get this to work. Doing that now. <br /><br />

First experience is a lot less positive than I hoped after such a long wait.<br /><br />

<strong>Edit</strong><br /><br />

Another odd little thing, it took a very long time for 1+ Mb to download last night. Google suggests all sorts of things that make the wireless connection slow, but here's the thing, I'm using a <strong>wired</strong> connection, since my wifi doesn't quite reach the corner the PS3 is in. Odd. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/59-If-you-want-fish,-go-to-the-Caribbean.html" rel="alternate" title="&quot;If you want fish, go to the Caribbean&quot; " />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-08-27T22:28:48Z</published>
        <updated>2008-08-27T22:53:13Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=59</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=59</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/59-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">&quot;If you want fish, go to the Caribbean&quot; </title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                We went to Alcudia on a family holiday this year, and spent a lot of the time around the pool watching Aimee enjoy her swimming. One day, we decided we would take a boat trip from the ones at the harbour. There was only one that appealed - which was essentially a glass bottom boat. We took it because we thought Aimee would enjoy seeing the fish, and it was relatively short. It was around €42 for the three of us. Not a huge amount, but not that cheap for a two hour trip.<br /><br />

<div class="serendipity_imageComment_left" style="width: 83px"><div class="serendipity_imageComment_img"><a class='serendipity_image_link' href='http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/uploads/fish.jpg'><!-- s9ymdb:20 --><img class="serendipity_image_left" width="83" height="110"  src="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/uploads/fish.serendipityThumb.jpg" alt="" /></a></div><div class="serendipity_imageComment_txt">The advert for our trip</div></div>
The boat was a catamaran, and both sides of each hull had rather short windows in them. There wasn't a lot of space considering the number of people on board. We had a quick look downstairs, and there wasn't anything to see. We spent around 30 minutes picking people up from other piers along the coast and then headed off. Periodically we would check downstairs; nothing to see. Never mind, plenty of time yet. We went out around the coast for quite some time, travelling at a fair lick so there again, was nothing to see. Finally we stopped briefly (a minute or two at a time in a few coves). I saw one fish, and the seaweed on the bottom. Aimee, who you will recall was the reason for the trip saw no fish at all. The whole journey was just viewing a blue rectangle. The only life visible most of the time were people in the other hull also looking for something. Well that was it. and back to port.<br /><br />

Now Karen and I have been on a submarine, and I think "submarine vision" was kind of pushing it, so Karen went to complain at the desk. The girl explained the manager was not available, and another man in the booth laughingly said "you didn't pay for the fish". Uh, but we did, and I think from the poster, it's clear we did. I'm a diver, and have spent many hours on boats, I'm not that excited about them to pay for a two hour round trip.<br /><br />

The next day Karen got the hotel reception to call the manager, one "Toni Capllonch Alenyar". He wouldn't speak to her at all, referring conversation through his receptionist. After lots of nonsense including putting the phone down on us (causing our angry receptionist to phone him straight back), he eventually relayed through his receptionist "If you want fish, go the Caribbean". Another hang up, after which they no longer answered the phone.<br /><br />

So we saw more fish at the beach than we did on the "Submarine Vision" trip, and given the reply, it looks a bit like a deliberate deception, but hey, take his advice, I've been to the Caribbean, and they know how to do trips to see fish. For that matter I'd avoid his other trips too, maybe they aren't quite as they are advertised either. I've at least had the pleasure of depriving them of some more business. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/58-Nokia-N95.html" rel="alternate" title="Nokia N95" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-08-22T09:42:42Z</published>
        <updated>2008-08-25T00:09:54Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=58</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=58</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/6-hardware" label="hardware" term="hardware" />
            <category scheme="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/3-review" label="review" term="review" />
    
        <id>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/58-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Nokia N95</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Just before we went on our family holiday, I went with Karen to look at new phones for me and for her. Karen liked the look of the phone, but wanted it in a specific colour and was prepared to wait to order that. I decided I liked the look of the Nokia N95. The iPhone is not an attractive prospect for me, apparently it's a poor phone, a poor camera and there even seem to be issues with its sound. So no amount of astounding user interface makes up for that. The <a href="http://samsungomnia.com/">Samsung Omnia</a>, coming out soon, looks really interesting but it runs Windows CE, and that's a big minus for me. I'm very interested in the <a href="http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Neo_FreeRunner">OpenMoko FreeRunner neo</a> which can, among other things run my favourite operating system <a href="http://www.debian.org">Debian</a>, after the great work done at debconf. Apparently it's not however a useful and reliable phone, which is definitely a minus too. Maybe next generation, and I can't hack everything at once.<br /><br />

The Nokia N95 runs <a href="http://www.symbian.com/">Symbian</a> which is a plus. I was warned that the battery life was poor and given the choice between the conventional model with an 8 Gb card, and the N95 8Gb which has the memory totally internalised. The former also has a shutter cover for the lens, which was discarded in the latter to allow a larger battery. I wanted the cover. I got the handset from <a href="http://www.phones4u.co.uk/">Phones4u</a> and it's an O2 handset, who I have my contract with. It took a while to put the order though, so they gave me £50 for waiting. So, seriously, I got the free upgrade, the memory card, a screen protector and £50 in my hand. The bundled accessories are good, a USB cable (like the much criticised N800 it doesn't seem to do charging) a car charger, a tiny regular charger (same as the N800 actually) and the usual ear phones, with a small control panel on a cable for the sound.<br /><br /> <br /><a href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/58-Nokia-N95.html#extended">Continue reading "Nokia N95"</a>
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/57-In-OHare-Airport-Bring-entertainment....html" rel="alternate" title="In O'Hare Airport? Bring entertainment..." />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-07-31T18:28:26Z</published>
        <updated>2008-07-31T18:28:26Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=57</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=57</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/57-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">In O'Hare Airport? Bring entertainment...</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://gondolin.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I'm back from Chicago for a while now. On the last day (which was a Sunday (13th June)) I walked with some colleagues from our hotel to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnificent_Mile">Magnificent Mile</a> where, underneath the John Hancock building, we had brunch at the Cheesecake Factory; food was good but the service was quite slow and consequently two of our number were tight for their flights. I walked back with them to the hotel, at a slowish pace for me, but probably rather two fast for them (on my own, I walk at quite a speed). Once I said my farewell's to them at the hotel, I had some more time to kill on what was a sunny, windy day in downtown Chicago. Incidentally, there are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windy_City%2C_Origin_of_Name_(Chicago)">rival theories behind the nick name "Windy City"</a>.<br /><br />

I walked in the opposite direction from the hotel towards <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sears_tower">Sears Tower</a> and, after taking a little time to find the entrance that was actually open for the sky deck, I found the queue to be 45 minutes. While I was mildly interested in going up, I felt this might be a bit tight if it got any longer as I was heading for my own flight, and anyway, I'd previously made it up the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hancock_Center">John Hancock Centre</a> as I mentioned <a href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/56-Trip-to-Chicago.html">previously</a>. So I wandered around the streets for a while, but rapidly found that everything on that side of the city was closed for Sunday, and I didn't particularly feel any desire to walk back to the magnificent mile again. So I thought I'd head to the airport a little early, and get sorted out, and look around anything they had there.<br /><br />

Now, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O%27hare_Airport">O'Hare</a>, like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heathrow">Heathrow</a> is one of the busiest airports in the world. Plenty of people complain about Heathrow, but I must confess, I kind of like it, you're as likely to have transport problems in any airport in the world. Like my <a href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/56-Trip-to-Chicago.html">previously mentioned problems in Dublin</a>, but at least in Dublin there were a few shops, and restaurants, and in Heathrow I can browse around for a long time without getting bored.<br /><br />

O'Hare is just plain dull. I got there in good time, checked in, declined the offer of 700 USD to upgrade to first class and saw an aisle leading to the security section, on either side there were around two shops / diners or whatever. I bought a few souvenirs in one of the shops while I watched the huge queue, and by the time I'd come out there was a much shorter queue. There seemed to be very little to do on that side, so I figured, that like many airports, it had more on the "air-side". I waited to get through security, and on the other side located my gate. I saw a modest sort of news stand, it sold some magazines, duty free cigarettes, wine and some travel adapters, along with a small selection of drinks and snacks. There was an identical one on the other side of security. I walked all the way around the gates and back, and realised this was it... absolutely all there was. I would have bought a Coke, but they only sold Pepsi, so I opted for a Gatorade Fruit Punch which proudly declared on the label the lack of any past association with any fruit. Then I sat down and was just plain bored. I had been kind of hoping to buy a <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/search?ie=UTF8&keywords=samsung+t10&tag=mycroft16-21&index=blended&linkCode=ur2&camp=1634&creative=6738">Samsung T10 mp3 player</a> on my travels, I'd bought one for Karen for her birthday (yes, it works with Linux), but this was one of the few airports in the world I've been to, where they had nothing like that on sale.<br /><br />

So, shop somewhere else, and be prepared to be bored. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>

</feed>